![]()
This is very cool because this way there is no risk or effort involved using AppCode instead of XCode. It leaves editing NIB files (Interface Builder) entirely up to XCode.It behind the scenes uses the XCode compiler to build your app.AppCode doesn’t have its own project file format, but instead it opens existing XCode projects.They basically built the entire IDE “on top” of XCode. I suspect the guys from JetBrains have also foreseen this problem and came up with a very clever solution. A third party IDE would probably have a hard time catching up to the latest iOS version every release. So you will never run into compatibility issues. Because the power of how Apple distributes new releases of the SDK is, that the tools are also updated with every release. Currently it is still in some kind of pre-beta stage they call EAP (Early Access Program), but already it looks very very promising.Īt first I was very sceptical about AppCode, because I didn’t believe in an IDE not part of the standard iOS SDK package. With AppCode they basically built an IDE very similar to IntelliJ, but instead of Java it supports Objective C. This is where AppCode comes in, it is developed by the same people as IntelliJ: JetBrains. But, as I found out, XCode 4 still needs to come a long way to even come close to the usability of IntelliJ. Recently XCode 4 was released, which admittedly has improved a lot compared to XCode 3. ![]() Furthermore, I was learning a new language and had to accept that I’m in a different world now. It is clear Steve Jobs was not involved creating this tool.Īfter I came to the conclusion I was probably just spoiled by IntelliJ, I accepted the fact that XCode wasn’t as good. JETBRAINS APPCODE VS XCODE SOFTWAREXCode doesn’t look like a software tool that’s developed by Apple at all. Until recently there weren’t any real alternatives.Ĭompared to IntelliJ, XCode looks very basic to me because it has no handy shortcuts, good refactoring tools or other handy features that I’m used to in IntelliJ. XCode is the IDE you have to use in order to develop iOS and Mac apps. This is because I have been using IntelliJ for the past five years, which I love working with ever since I first started using it. ![]() JETBRAINS APPCODE VS XCODE FOR FREEIt is also available for free for educational institutions and companies, and for open-source project development.When I started writing my first iPhone app, I was quite disappointed with XCode. JETBRAINS APPCODE VS XCODE TRIALIt is available as a 30-day trial and has discounted licensing available until December 31 st 2011. JETBRAINS APPCODE VS XCODE FOR MAC OS XUnlike Xcode, which attempts to treat tests as a build-time operation, Xcode can launch tests and debug them within the IDE, including debugging variables during the testing process.ĪppCode is available for Mac OS X 10.5 and above, and requires that a JVM and the Apple Developer tools are installed as well. JETBRAINS APPCODE VS XCODE CODECode smells are highlighted and can be fixed with one of the quick-fix options, or refactored using the same kinds of refactoring available to other JetBrains IDEs.įinally, testing with AppCode is much easier than it is with Xcode, with an integrated OCUnit runner. The code detection can look for missing retains/releases, as well as prompt for their inclusion, but it also supports GC and ARC from recent iOS builds. In addition, for iOS development, AppCode can launch the Apple Developer Tools simulator. The integration with version control systems includes all the popular ones (Git, Subversion, Mercurial) as well as some archaic ones (CVS).ĪppCode can open Xcode projects, and although it has no replacement for Interface Builder, it can launch nibs and xibs to bring them up in the already installed version. Those with long experience with Xcode (and ProjectBuilder before it) are likely to take some time in getting used to the way it works, but those with existing IntelliJ experience will get used to it much faster. ![]() On Lion, if a JVM isn't installed then Lion will prompt to download the latest JVM before the app launches other installs of OSX will already have a JVM installed by default.Īs with any IDE, getting used to the way the app navigates presents a one-time learning exercise. That includes the fact that the runtime is entirely implemented in Java, which implies that a JVM (1.6 or above) is required in order to run the IDE. The similarities with IDEA will be noticed by those who are familiar with it on other platforms. JetBrains has released AppCode, an IDE for Objective-C that looks and feels similar to their namesake IntelliJ IDEA editor for Java. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |